Kitely / Case study 00

Driving 2× sales for a premium FMCG brand

Pair precise audience selection with relevant creator content.

Saudi ArabiaPremium FMCGNot specified in PDF

Reported outcome / 01

2×

Sales vs baseline

Reported outcome / 02

150%

Reported ROAS

Source: Kitely case-study PDF · Reported results, not independently audited

Chocolate product packaging reproduced from the FMCG case-study PDF; brand identity is not independently established.
Imagery from the original case document · Not independent evidence of client identity or results

01 / The starting point

The growth constraint.

Mass-market advertising was not connecting premium products with the right consumers or channels.

The case document describes a premium FMCG brand in Saudi Arabia struggling to reach affluent consumers. Traditional mass-market advertising delivered limited sales growth. The diagnosis focused on a mismatch between distribution strategy and the audience’s media consumption, weakening the premium positioning.

02 / Strategy into execution

One connected approach.
Not isolated tactics.

01

Affluent micro-targeting

Used audience analysis to reach high-net-worth consumers on Snapchat and Instagram, refining targeting around luxury interests and behaviors.

02

Creator activations

Co-created content with high-end lifestyle influencers, emphasizing genuine audience engagement and relevance rather than follower counts alone.

The intervention map
  1. 01

    Identify

    Define the relevant affluent audience

  2. 02

    Reach

    Select preferred digital platforms

  3. 03

    Activate

    Co-create lifestyle content

  4. 04

    Connect

    Align audience, message and product

Editorial map of the documented interventions, not a measured funnel or dated project timeline.

03 / The reported impact

Read the result.
Understand the measure.

Each baseline is normalized to 100. Both bars use the same 0–200 scale. Actual starting values are not supplied in the source.

Sales2× baseline
Baseline100Reported result200

Source figures at a glance

Sales vs baseline
2×
Reported ROAS
150%

Evidence & measurement boundaries

The PDF reports 2× sales and 150% ROAS; 150% is a reported ROAS level, not a 150% improvement. It describes CAC as ‘Optimized’ without a numerical reduction. No spend, sales baseline, campaign duration or attribution method is supplied. The indexed sales comparison is derived from the reported multiplier, not a time series. Results are Kitely-reported and not independently audited.

Client name is not stated in the PDF text. Past reported results do not guarantee future performance.

04 / Lessons from the work

What this case puts into focus.

Relevance over scale

The case favors a smaller, relevant audience over undifferentiated reach.

Creator fit over follower count

Audience quality and engagement were central to the documented creator-selection approach.

Channels follow the audience

Platform choices should reflect the intended consumers’ media habits, not a default channel mix.

05 / Go to the source

The original case study.

Original, unmodified Kitely PDF · 2 pages · 1.8 MB

Bridge strategy and execution

Your challenge. The next growth story.

Bring your market, offer and current growth constraint. Define the right scope with Kitely.

Start Growth